How a S$7.3 Million Loss Can Actually Be Good News: A Deep Dive into Lion Asiapac’s Surprising Quarter
Introduction: The Headline vs. The Story
It’s a fundamental rule of thumb in business: a multi-million dollar loss is a clear sign of a company in trouble. When investors see red ink on a financial report, the immediate reaction is often concern, suggesting operational struggles, declining sales, or unsustainable costs. A loss is, by definition, a negative result.
This brings us to the latest financial report from Lion Asiapac Limited. The headline figure is stark: for the quarter ending September 30, 2025, the company reported a net loss of S7.34 million. But what if that headline number doesn’t just hide the real story, but actively inverts it? What if a S7.34 million loss was actually the net result of a profitable S$1.93 million transaction? That’s the surprising story buried in Lion Asiapac’s latest report.
This article explores three surprising takeaways that reveal a far more optimistic reality. By digging just one layer deeper than the headline, we uncover how a significant reported loss can mask a story of strategic brilliance, a stronger balance sheet, and a healthier core business.
Takeaway One: Revenue Skyrocketed 88%, So Why the Massive Loss?
The most jarring contradiction in the report is the simultaneous surge in revenue and the plunge into a deep loss. Group revenue increased by an impressive 88% to S8.04 million for the quarter, up from S4.28 million in the previous year. Yet, this was contrasted by a net loss of S7.34 million, a dramatic swing from the S157,000 loss recorded a year prior.
The answer lies not in the company’s operations, but in the complex accounting of a single strategic decision: the sale of its foreign subsidiary, Compact Energy Sdn Bhd (CESB). This one transaction had two powerful, opposing effects on the income statement:
- A S$1.93 million cash gain on the sale itself. This was a profitable deal that directly benefited the company.
- A S$9.33 million non-cash charge for the “Derecognition of foreign currency reserve.”
This second item is the source of the confusion. It is a one-time accounting adjustment required by financial reporting standards when a foreign asset is sold. Think of this as closing a ledger that has been open for years; it doesn’t represent cash spent this quarter, but rather the settling of currency value changes that have accumulated over the entire life of the investment. This S$9.33 million charge is a “paper loss” that, while impacting the bottom line, doesn’t reflect a real-time cash outflow or a problem with the company’s ongoing business. The misleading headline loss is simply the net result of this large paper charge overwhelming the actual profit from the sale.
Takeaway Two: The Company’s Bank Account Grew, a Lot.
While the profit and loss statement showed a significant loss, the company’s cash position told the opposite story. According to the report, the Group’s cash and cash equivalents increased by S14.5 million, growing to a very healthy **S52.2 million** as of September 30, 2025.
The primary driver of this huge cash influx was the very same event that caused the paper loss: the sale of the CESB subsidiary. The company’s cash flow statement shows that it received **S10.01 million in net cash** from this disposal. This is the masterstroke of the quarter: the transaction that created the scary S7.34 million headline loss was the exact same transaction that filled the company’s bank account with fresh capital and booked a S$1.93 million gain.
This strategic move frees up the company to focus on its core business, as stated in its own commentary on future plans:
“Moving forward, the Group will focus on growing the roofing and trading businesses, while actively exploring new investment opportunities to enhance shareholders’ value.”
Takeaway Three: Underneath the Noise, the Core Business is Growing.
With the subsidiary sale now complete, we can get a clearer picture of Lion Asiapac’s remaining operations—and that picture is positive. The impressive 88% revenue growth was not an anomaly; it was driven by “higher trading orders and increased supply of roofing solutions,” indicating strong and growing demand for the company’s core products.
More importantly, these core operations are profitable. The report’s segmental breakdown reveals that the “supply of roofing solutions” segment generated a profit of S270,000** for the quarter. But the strategic brilliance of the CESB sale goes even deeper. A look at the notes reveals that the disposed subsidiary was actually losing money, having incurred a **loss of S157,000 in the period before its sale.
This context is critical. The disposal of CESB wasn’t just about raising cash; it was about jettisoning an underperforming, loss-making asset. This move allows the company to concentrate its resources on its stronger, growing divisions. The one-time accounting loss has effectively cleared the decks, allowing the performance of the healthier core business to become more visible in future financial reports.
Conclusion: Always Read Beyond the Headline
Lion Asiapac’s S$7.34 million loss is a textbook example of why headline numbers can be profoundly misleading. A quick glance suggests a company in distress, but a closer look reveals a much more encouraging narrative of a company making smart, strategic decisions.
The misleading S7.34 million loss was the result of a S9.33 million non-cash accounting charge that completely overshadowed a profitable S$1.93 million gain from the strategic disposal of a loss-making subsidiary. That same sale dramatically improved the company’s cash position, and the core business that remains is both growing and profitable.
This case is a powerful reminder to dig deeper than the headlines—how many other opportunities are hidden behind numbers that look like bad news at first glance?
WATCH THE EXPLAINER VIDEO BELOW:
LISTEN TO THE PODCAST BELOW:
Related stories: Lion Asiapac: Q4 and FY2025 Loss