The Paper Deficit

For the undisciplined investor, the half-year results from Lion Asiapac Limited for the period ended 31 December 2025 offer a textbook case of headline panic. A reported net loss of S$6.4 million usually signals a fundamental breakdown in the business model. However, beneath the regulatory red ink, the Group’s operational vitals and balance sheet hygiene tell a story of strategic de-risking rather than distress.

1. The Accounting “Ghost” in the Machine

The reported deficit is almost entirely a byproduct of technical accounting rather than operational failure. The S$6.4 million loss is a “paper” consequence of the disposal and subsequent de-consolidation of Compact Energy Sdn Bhd (CESB).

While discontinued operations posted a S7.56 million loss, this figure was bloated by a S9.33 million realization of the foreign currency translation reserve (FCTR). It is critical to understand that this is a non-cash accounting reclassification from equity reserves to the income statement. It represents a historical accumulation of currency fluctuations being moved between accounting buckets upon the exit of a foreign subsidiary—not an outflow of cash. As management signaled in its preliminary guidance:

“The Group expects to incur a loss for the half year ended 31 December 2025, primarily attributable to the one-off realisation of the foreign currency translation reserve arising from the de-consolidation of Compact Energy Sdn Bhd.”

2. Unmasking the Profitable Core

By excising the underperforming CESB unit, Lion Asiapac has effectively unmasked a profitable core in its continuing operations. Revenue from these segments surged by 53%, climbing from S9.45 million in the prior year to S14.47 million. More significantly, continuing operations swung from a S195,000 loss to a net profit of S1.16 million.

The composition of this revenue is equally telling. “Sales of goods” was the primary engine, contributing S12.51 million, while “Construction contracts” accounted for S1.96 million. This shift toward product-based revenue provides a more predictable foundation than the lumpy nature of construction cycles.

3. The Roofing Renaissance and Segmental Drags

The “Supply of Roofing Solutions” segment has emerged as the Group’s undisputed growth driver, contributing S11.44 million in revenue and a S0.4 million segment profit. This 25% quarter-on-quarter revenue increase suggests a strengthening market position in Malaysia, even as global economic uncertainty persists.

However, the “leaner” narrative is still a work in progress. While roofing is the star, the Trading and Investment Holding segments acted as a combined S537,000 drag on the bottom line (reporting losses of S96,000 and S$441,000 respectively). These peripheral losses justify the Group’s stated focus on “operational efficiency” as it continues to clean up its portfolio.

4. The S$11 Million Cash Paradox

The ultimate proof of Lion Asiapac’s liquidity lies in its ability to reward shareholders despite the reported loss. In October 2025, the company completed a capital reduction exercise, distributing S$11 million in cash.

The most impressive “alpha” for investors is that even after this massive payout, the Group’s cash and cash equivalents grew to S46.0 million, up from S37.7 million at the start of the fiscal year. This resilience was fueled by the CESB sale, which generated a net cash inflow of S10.94 million. Furthermore, a “retention amount” of S641,000 from the deal remains to be unlocked, providing a small tailwind for future liquidity.

Conclusion: Cash-Flow over Accounting Profits

The disposal of CESB and the subsequent capital distribution have transformed Lion Asiapac into a more focused entity. For the sophisticated investor, the relevant metric here is not the Price-to-Earnings ratio—rendered useless by one-off accounting charges—but the Group’s Net Asset Value (NAV) of 63.13 cents per share and its S$46 million cash pile.

The Group’s forward-looking mandate is clear, as noted in management’s commentary:

“The Group will remain focused on cost management, operational efficiency and strengthening customer relationships… while also exploring new investment opportunities.”

Ultimately, investors must decide if they value the technical “red ink” of an accounting reclassification or the reality of a 53% revenue surge and a balance sheet that remains robust even after returning significant capital to its owners. In the case of Lion Asiapac, the “loss” appears to be the price of admission for a much healthier business.

WATCH THE EXPLAINER VIDEO BELOW:

LISTEN TO THE PODCAST BELOW:

Related stories: Why Lion Asiapac’s S$7 Million Loss In Q1 2025 Isn’t As Bad As It Seems