4 Shocking Red Flags Hidden in a Single Financial Report

Sometimes, buried within the tables and footnotes, corporate financial reports tell a dramatic story of a company in crisis. The latest unaudited financial statement from United Food Holdings Limited is a prime example. This single document reads less like a standard corporate filing and more like a chronicle of profound operational, governance, and internal challenges.

This post will highlight four of the most surprising and impactful revelations found within the company’s report for the six months ending September 30, 2025, painting a clear picture of a company facing an existential threat.

1. The Company Earns Absolutely Nothing

The most startling fact is found on the first page of the financials, in the “Condensed Interim Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.” For the entire six-month period, United Food Holdings reported zero revenue. Not a single dollar from its continuing operations, and no revenue from its discontinued operations either.

For any business, generating zero revenue is an existential threat. It means the core operational engine of the company has completely stalled. For a publicly listed entity, it raises fundamental questions about its viability and purpose, suggesting a complete halt in the business activities that are meant to create shareholder value.

2. It’s Being Kicked Off the Stock Exchange

But the company’s inability to sell anything is just the beginning of its troubles. On August 14, 2024, the company received a delisting notification from the Singapore Exchange (SGX). As part of this process, the company is required to provide a “fair and reasonable exit offer to shareholders,” giving them a final opportunity to cash out their investment.

However, the process appears to be mired in delays. The report notes that the company is still “liaising with [the] Independent Financial Advisor to finalize the exit offer proposal.” The frustration with this delay is palpable even within the company’s own board, as highlighted by this blunt statement from board member Prof. Ling:

“Prof. Ling believes it is unacceptable for the Company to delay the exit offer until December 2025. He has urged the Company to appoint the IFA and announce the exit offer immediately.”

3. The Corporate Ship is Missing its Crew

Beyond the financial and regulatory crises, the company is gripped by a complete breakdown in corporate governance. Key oversight and administrative roles essential for a public company are vacant. A section detailing the views of another board member, Mr. Chng, provides a concise and damning assessment:

“The Company has not appointed an auditor… does not have an IA [Internal Auditor]. There is also no access to legal counsel. The Company has not appointed a company secretary.”

These are not optional roles. Their collective absence indicates a fundamental failure of the corporate structure. Without an auditor, financials are untrustworthy. Without an internal auditor, internal controls are nonexistent. Without a company secretary, board functions and compliance grind to a halt. And without legal counsel, the company is flying blind through a crisis.

The real-world consequence of this hollowing-out is paralysis. As the report states, “As a result, Mr. Chng and Prof Ling are hamstrung and unable to seek external professional views on the status of the matters in the results announcement.” The missing crew isn’t just an abstract problem—it is actively preventing the remaining board members from doing their jobs.

4. A Board Member Voted “No” on the Financials

Perhaps the most dramatic revelation is one of open dissent from within the company’s highest level of leadership. It is exceptionally rare for a financial report to detail a board member’s vote against the approval of the very financials being presented.

The report explicitly states that Prof. Ling voted “against” the approval of the unaudited results for the period. His reasons, detailed in the document, signal a profound lack of confidence in the company’s financial stability and reporting. His key concerns include:

• Serious “going concern and liquidity issues” due to the lack of a cash flow forecast.
• The existence of overdue payables, including “staff salaries and professional fees”—a direct and predictable consequence of the company generating zero revenue.
• The fact that “Meaningful financial support from the controlling shareholder(s) has not been forthcoming.”
• Uncertainty regarding the collection of major receivables from Shenzhen Shareihome Technology Co., Ltd. (“SST”) and KangweiJian (“KWJ”).

This public dissent from a board member is a powerful signal of a deep internal crisis. It suggests that confidence in the company’s management and its future trajectory has collapsed, not just among outside observers, but within its own boardroom.

Conclusion: A Story of Collapse

Woven together, these four points from a single financial report tell a cohesive story of a company in severe distress. A complete absence of revenue shows a business that has ceased to function. A forced delisting from the stock exchange marks a failure to meet basic regulatory standards. A hollowed-out corporate governance structure removes all essential checks and balances. And finally, a board member’s public vote of “no confidence” reveals a leadership team in open conflict.

When a company’s own public filings paint such a bleak picture, who is ultimately left to protect the interests of its shareholders?

WATCH THE EXPLAINER VIDEO BELOW:

LISTEN TO THE PODCAST BELOW:

Related stories: Old Chang Kee 1H 2026 Profit Gets Crushed